Page 1 of 1

點解要求情

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 10:32 am
by szekt
打你係應份 :onion57: :onion57: :onion57:

Re: 點解要求情

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:12 pm
by alexchrome
你地無做錯 , 所以無必要求情 :ymhug: :ymhug: :ymhug: :ymhug: :ymhug:

Re: 點解要求情

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 4:46 pm
by 韋信
講起求情,記得當年謝霆鋒撞車搵人頂包案,由清洪有大律師去打。一審判左謝霆鋒有罪,清洪大狀求情時指謝霆鋒係『一時錯失』。兩星期後則對判決上訴,堅持謝霆鋒『無參與頂包協議』和『污點證人成國定不可信』。但明明求情時已經認左 ....... 所以話法律既野,我識條鐵咩。

Re: 點解要求情

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:13 am
by Pierre
szekt wrote: 打你係應份 :onion57: :onion57: :onion57:
因為你樣衰激發我情緒, 所以應該判樣衰果個坐而唔係打人果個

Re: 點解要求情

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:38 pm
by milo
光明磊落,唔好認衰仔求情,做個硬漢子 \:D/ \:D/
入到去同獄友打成一片 :-bd

Re: 點解要求情

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 3:39 pm
by sorry
最好訪問下以前試過打犯又俾人周到, 又係份工無埋, 點睇呢單野好過。
成班出黎叫求情減刑既議員一哥咁, 只係會盲撐

Re: 點解要求情

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:28 pm
by bobby chu
sorry wrote: 最好訪問下以前試過打犯又俾人周到, 又係份工無埋, 點睇呢單野好過。
成班出黎叫求情減刑既議員一哥咁, 只係會盲撐
Image


http://hkm.appledaily.com/detail.php?is ... ry=instant" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: 點解要求情

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 1:37 am
by clivel
X( X( X(

Re: 點解要求情

Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2017 12:37 pm
by alexchrome
:fuck: